- Percentage of surveyed Australians in the general community who agree it is important for Aboriginal people to have a say in matters that affect them. 
- Same figure for surveyed Aboriginal people. 
List of articles
Aboriginal land councils
Aboriginal nations declaring independence
Aboriginal ownership makes self-determination successful
Aboriginal political parties
Aboriginal representative bodies
Aboriginal sovereignty in Australia
Culture of victimisation prevents empowerment
Explainer: Uluru Statement from the Heart
Principles of self-determination
Proclamation: First Nations' Sovereignty
Self-determination means consultation & dialogue
Treaty timeline: Events from 1835 to today
Voting rights for Aboriginal people
Would a treaty help Aboriginal self-determination?
What is "self-determination"?
Self-determination involves a substantive transfer of decision-making power from government to Indigenous peoples. It requires programs and resources that can assist them in rebuilding their own decision-making capabilities. 
Self-determination can include everything from being actively involved in policy formulation to providing services from cultural peers (rather than outside of Aboriginal culture) or making Aboriginal movies themselves (rather than by non-Aboriginal directors about them).
Self-determination is something you take, not something a government gives you. — Gary Foley, Aboriginal activist 
Self-determination and self-government are essential bases for making sustained improvements in the social and economic conditions of Aboriginal people.
If governance is executed the right way, for example in a culturally responsive way, data shows that Aboriginal people are "in the driving seat" of their own development. 
Self-determination encompasses both land rights and self-governance, as land is understood to be the economic (and in some cases spiritual) basis for Aboriginal communities to be self-governing. 
It is one of the strongest contributors towards Aboriginal health.
Some slogans and chants Aboriginal people have used to fight for their rights and sovereignty are:
- ‘We have survived’
- ‘Always was and always will be Aboriginal land’
- ‘Sovereignty never ceded’
- ‘Pay the rent’
Do you know of another one?
What unites Indigenous leaders around the world is a burning desire for their people to be respected, resourced properly and then left to make their own share of mistakes and their own progress. — Jeff McMullen, journalist 
Self-determination: issues and problems
Family-run dynasties within some Aboriginal communities can weaken Aboriginal self-determination. They pretend to be community-controlled but are not operating within the strict community-controlled organisation guidelines. 
Some Aboriginal communities have established a two-class system in health, housing and education where the preferred class gets quick access to programs and services while the other class has to join a waiting list. 
Service providers renounce responsibility
Some service providers misuse the push for self-determination as their way out of responsibility.
They took self-determination as ‘permission’ to either abandon or ignore their responsibilities, arguing that under self-determination it was ‘inappropriate’ for them to be involved. Aboriginal health became an ‘Aboriginal problem’ that mainstream services appeared to be absolved from. 
Clashing with the law
As more and more Aboriginal people work out what self-determination means for them in detail, some of their choices clash with the law of state and territory governments.
Murrumu Walubara Yidindji (formerly known as Jeremy Geia) has renounced his Australian citizenship and returned his passport, Medicare card and driver’s licence. He quit his job, gave away most possessions and walked away from his bank savings and a superannuation account built up over two decades. His car bears number plates "licensed to the sovereign Yidindji government"  (reading "Yidindji - YID-001 - Pursuant to Yidindji Tribal Law"), challenging police who have never seen such a situation.
Murrumu was subsequently charged with driving an unregistered and uninsured vehicle with false plates, driving without a licence while possessing "an article resembling a licence". 
Gary Tomlinson, also known by his tribal name Wit Boooka, faced a week in jail after refusing to recognise state law that forced him to provide fingerprints and DNA evidence for a charge of trespass. 
Only after he was allowed to sign using his tribal name, and that his agreement to the bail conditions did not imply any concession that Queensland law had any legitimate power over him, was Boooka spared a week in jail.
When started Aboriginal self-determination in Australia?
The first expression of Aboriginal self-determination is usually said to be in 1972 when the Whitlam government abolished the White Australia Policy and introduced a policy of self-determination.
But 50 years before that Aboriginal activists already lobbied for self-determination when they formed the Australian Aboriginal Progressive Association (AAPA) in April 1925. 
The AAPA drew inspiration from the ideology and tactics of Marcus Garvey's Universal Negro Improvement Association , founded 1914 in Africa and 1917 in the US.
Presided by Fred Maynard, the AAPA made front page news with headlines like "Aborigines In Conference—Self Determination Is Their Aim—To Help A People".
The AAPA attracted widespread support from Aboriginal communities and established 11 branches with a membership of more than 500 at a time when the Aboriginal Protection Board reported the total Aboriginal population of NSW as less than 7,000. 
In its manifesto the AAPA demanded 
- 40 acres of land to be granted to each and every Aboriginal family in Australia,
- to end the policy of child removal from their families by the Aboriginal Protection Board,
- to replace the Aboriginal Protection Board by an all-Aboriginal body to oversee Aboriginal affairs,
- citizenship for Aboriginal people within their own country,
- a Royal Commission into Aboriginal affairs,
- the federal government to take control of Aboriginal affairs, and
- the right to protect a strong Aboriginal cultural identity.
Self-determination in the USA
There is "ample evidence" that the US policy of self-determination, formally adopted in the 1970s, is the only US Indian policy ever linked to sustained improvements in socioeconomic conditions in Indian communities. 
The North American experience shows that self-determination pays off, provided that Aboriginal tribes not only assume responsibility for their own affairs but invest time and energy in building governing institutions that can capably exercise decision-making power and that have the support of their own peoples. Non-Aboriginal governments must then take self-determination seriously.
Dozens of treaties have been signed in the United States and Canada which afford First Nations communities varying degrees of genuine self-determination, from controlling their own schooling to giving them a real capacity to generate an economic base. 
There are more than 250 Native American tribal courts across at least 32 states in the US, which handle everything from criminal matters to family court.
Native American corporations and individuals are exempt from various state and federal taxes, including state income tax for people living on reservations.
The Agreements, Treaties and Negotiated Settlements database (ATNS) offers a wealth of information relating to agreements between Aboriginal people and others in Australia and overseas.
It includes background information on each agreement; links to related agreements, organisations, signatories and events; a glossary of relevant terminology as well as direct access to published and on-line resources.
Reconciliation Australia has a section on Aboriginal governance called the Indigenous Governance Toolkit.
It is Australia's only comprehensive online resource aimed at strengthening Aboriginal community and organisational governance. The toolkit provides stories about what works, case studies, resources, videos and templates.